FY 2003 Lower Columbia Proposal 31019 |
Return to Proposal Finder |
Proposal Table of Contents |
Additional Documents |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 1. General Administrative information Section 2. Past accomplishments Section 3. Relationships to other projects Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase Section 8. Budget Summary Reviews and Recommendations |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Title of Project Proposal | Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Program |
| BPA Project Proposal Number | 31019 |
| Business name of agency, institution, or organization requesting funding |
Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Operations Division |
| Business acronym (if appropriate) | WA County, OR DLUT |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
|
| Name | Janet Oatney |
| Mailing Address | 1400 SW Walnut St., MS 51 |
| City, State, Zip | Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 |
| Phone | 5038467652 |
| Fax | 5038467620 |
| janet_oatney@co.washington.or.us | |
| Manager of program authorizing this project | Gregory S. Miller, P.E., Operations Manager |
| Review Cycle | Lower Columbia |
| Province | Lower Columbia |
| Subbasin | Willamette |
| Short Description | Develop fish passage barrier assessment methodology for road / stream crossings, inventory and assess county owned facilities on a 5th field HUC basis, prioritize passage barriers to core habitat areas for threatened and endangered fish species. |
| Target Species | Winter Steelhead, cutthroat trout, all resident and anadromous fish species |
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tualatin River Watershed | ||
| Small Portion of Nehalam River Watershed |
| RPA |
|---|
| Action 150 |
| Action 152 |
| Action 154 |
NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal
| The expected outcomes of this project are:
Qualitative
Data generated by this project are:
Are there restrictions on the use of this data?
|
Where do the data reside?
Private/Managed Locally: Printed Electronic
Public Access:
|
In what other ways will information from this project be transferred or used? Will be forwarded to Clean Water Services for inclusion in the Watersheds 2000 database, available for inclusion in future watershed assessments by local councils & organizations. |
|
| Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: | None |
| Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): | anadromous |
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| not applicable |
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 20088 | Assess McKenzie Watershed Habitat & Prioritize Projects | supporting |
| 200001600 | Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge Additions | complimentary |
| 199206800 | Willamette Basin Mitigation Program | complimentary |
| 198403600 | Willamette River Projects Wildlife and Habitat Loss Assessment | complimentary |
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Finalize Barrier Assessment Methodology | a. Incorporate USFS "Measurements of Surrogates" techniques for fish passage assessment | .1 | $ 4,551 | |
| b. Develop inspection protocol | .05 | $ 2,275 | ||
| c. initiate recruitment process | .2 (concurent w/ objective 1.) | $ 0 | ||
| 2. Develop Prioritization Plan | a. Incorporate & modify Clackamas County's "Guide to Prioritizing Fish Passage Barriers" | .05 | $ 2,275 | |
| 3. Incorporate Existing Environmental data | a. Access urban water / habitat quality information from Clean Water Services | .1 | $ 4,551 | |
| b. Obtain electronic dataset of ODF&Ws limited fish passage assesment within Washington County. | .025 | $ 1,136 | ||
| c. Ensure spatial integration of data obtained by outside sources. | .1 | $ 4,550 | ||
| d. Utilize Multnomah County's existing GIS and IRIS (Common Public Works Database) links to ensure data compatiblity | .1 | $ 4,550 | ||
| 4. Obtain 5 year work program for Washington County Operations and Major Streets Improvements Programs | .01 | $ 0 | ||
| 5. Develop Comprehensive Plan for incorporating barrier assessments, structural condition, environmental quality, & gained habitat opportunity information into one data set that can be linked through the County's existing database | .2 | $ 4,551 | ||
| 6. NEPA | **Applicants Note: phone conversation with Nancy Weintraub, BPA, indicates that minimal NEPA review will be required; categorical exclusion will be the likely finding. Ms. Weintraub recommends a budgetary line item of $0.00.** | $ 0 |
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| no planning and design out year objectives | $ 0 |
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Conduct Dairy - McKay 5th Field barrier assessment & inventory | a. Train Staff | .05 | $ 2,276 | |
| b. Conduct assessments | .5 | $ 33,467 | ||
| c. Incorporate data into database | ongoing | $ 0 | ||
| d. Develop ranked triage lists of road - stream crossings that block fish passage | .1 | $ 5,625 |
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Conduct Gales Creek Assessment | 2004 | 2004 | $ 13,125 |
| 2. Conduct Upper Tualatin - Scoggins Assessment | 2004 | 2005 | $ 13,125 |
| 3. Conduct Middle Tualatin - Rock Creek Assessment | 2005 | 2005 | $ 13,125 |
| 4. Conduct Lower Tualatin Assessment | 2005 | 2006 | $ 13,125 |
| 5. Produce electronic and hard copy final assessment report | 2006 | 2006 | $ 8,325 |
| 6. Produce Washington County prioritization plan for removing barriers that block passage to fish species | 2006 | 2007 | $ 2,250 |
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $ 13,125 | $ 26,250 | $ 20,625 | $ 2,250 |
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Incorporate new environmental data as it becomes available | ongoing | $ 750 | ||
| 2. Maintain data integrity | ongoing | $ 750 |
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Incorporate new environmental data as it becomes available | 2004 | 2007 | $ 2,250 |
| 2. Maintain data integrity | 2004 | 2007 | $ 2,250 |
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $ 1,500 | $ 1,500 | $ 750 | $ 750 |
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Program Evaluation | .025 | $ 1,125 |
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Yearly Program Evaluation | 2004 | 2007 | $ 4,500 |
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $ 1,500 | $ 1,500 | $ 750 | $ 750 |
| Item | Note | FY 2003 Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $ 52,819 | |
| Fringe | $ 16,715 | |
| Supplies | $ 2,073 | |
| Travel | $ 0 | |
| Indirect | $ 0 | |
| Capital | $ 0 | |
| NEPA | $ 0 | |
| PIT tags | $ 0 | |
| Subcontractor | $ 0 | |
| Other | printing / distribution | $ 825 |
| Total Itemized Budget | $ 72,432 | |
| Total FY 2003 project cost | $ 72,432 |
|---|---|
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds | $ 0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $ 72,432 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $ 0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or In-Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multnomah County | Database & GIS technical assistance | $ 2,500 | in-kind |
| Clackamas County | Prioritization Software (in house design) | $ 5,000 | in-kind |
| Washington County | Staff, equipment, benefits, office, supplies | $ 28,665 | in-kind |
| US Forest Service | Assessment Methodology | $ 5,000 | in-kind |
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction/implementation | $ 13,125 | $ 26,250 | $ 20,625 | $ 2,250 |
| Operations and maintenance | $ 1,500 | $ 1,500 | $ 750 | $ 750 |
| Monitoring and evaluation | $ 1,500 | $ 1,500 | $ 750 | $ 750 |
| Total Outyear Budgets | $ 16,125 | $ 29,250 | $ 22,125 | $ 3,750 |
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
This project has not yet been reviewed